+91 76790 91881


Regulatory Restrictions on Public Deposits and Exemptions for Certain Companies under Section 73 of the Companies Act, 2013

Financial stability isn’t achieved overnight, therefore every company seeking financial stability and compliance must understand the regulatory restrictions on public deposits.

Section 73 of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) sheds light on regulatory restrictions and exemptions governing the acceptance of deposits from the public. By comprehensively examining the provisions and consequences outlined in the Act, companies can ensure compliance and mitigate risks effectively.

Regulatory Prohibitions on Public Deposits

Section 73(1) of Act, serves as a safeguard against fraudulent practices by prohibiting companies from soliciting deposits from the public, except under specified circumstances outlined in Chapter V. This restriction aims to protect the interests of depositors and maintain the integrity of financial transactions within the corporate sector.

Eligible companies, as defined under Section 73(1) of the Act, must meet specific criteria regarding net worth and turnover to qualify for deposit acceptance. However, these companies are subject to stringent compliance measures, including obtaining prior consent through a special resolution in a general meeting and filing the resolution with the Registrar of Companies and, if applicable, the Reserve Bank of India.

While Section 73(1) of the Act imposes limitations, Section 73(2) of the Act outlines conditions under which deposits can be accepted, emphasizing transparency and accountability. These conditions include submitting detailed circulars to members, maintaining separate accounts for deposits, and securing insurance policies for deposited amounts.

Exceptions and Exemptions for Eligible Companies

Exceptions to the prohibition in Section 73(1) of the Act allow certain entities to engage in deposit-taking activities despite the general restriction. These exceptions are crucial to ensure the functioning of vital financial institutions and facilitate the flow of funds in the economy.

  • Banking Companies: Institutions regulated under banking laws are exempt from the restrictions.
  • Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs): Entities falling within NBFC definitions are also excluded.
  • Entities Specified by Central Government: After consultation with the Reserve Bank of India, the Central Government may designate additional exempt entities.

Compliance Requirements for Accepting Deposits

Companies seeking to accept deposits must adhere to regulatory requirements outlined in Section 73(2) of the Act to ensure transparency and protect the interests of depositors. Failure to comply with these provisions may result in severe penalties, including fines and restrictions on future deposit-taking activities.

Key compliance measures include providing comprehensive disclosures to members, submitting circulars and financial statements to the Registrar of Companies, and maintaining adequate security for deposited funds.

 Additionally, companies must honour repayment obligations and refrain from defaulting on interest payments to avoid legal repercussions. Compliance with regulatory provisions necessitates adherence to stringent procedural requirements.

Section 73(2) of the Act mandates meticulous observance of several conditions:

  • Submission of Circular: A detailed circular must be disseminated among company members, elucidating financial statements, credit ratings, and previous deposit obligations.
  • Registrar Notification: Within a stipulated timeframe, a copy of the circular and accompanying statements must be furnished to the Registrar of Companies.
  • Deposit Escrow: Prior to a prescribed deadline, a substantial portion of accrued deposits must be placed in escrow, bolstering depositor security.
  • Insurance Coverage: Deposits must be shielded by an insurance policy, mitigating risks for depositors.
  • Default Ramifications: Default in deposit repayments may trigger punitive measures, including a moratorium on future deposit solicitations for up to five years.
  • Asset Charge: Assets of the company must be encumbered as collateral, safeguarding deposited funds.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Failure to adhere to the regulatory framework governing public deposits carries severe repercussions for companies and their officers. Section 73 of the Act mandates penalties for companies and officers found in default, with escalating fines for persistent violations.

Additionally, defaulting on deposit repayment obligations can lead to legal ramifications and tarnish the company’s reputation and financial stability.

If any company specified in Section 73(2) of the Act, or any eligible company soliciting deposits, or any individual violates any provision of these regulations without prescribed punishment in the Act, the company and every defaulting officer may face fines up to Rs. 5,000/- (Indian Rupees Five Thousand) as per Rule 21 of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 . For ongoing violations, additional fines of up to five hundred rupees per day may be imposed after the initial period of non-compliance.

Legal Recourse and Protective Measures

In addressing grievances stemming from deposit-related disputes, the Act offers legal avenues and protective measures to safeguard the interests of depositors. Sections 73(3) and 75 empower depositors to seek resolution through the National Company Law Tribunal holding companies accountable for financial harm resulting from fraudulent practices.

Moreover, Section 245 of the Act empowers depositors to submit applications to the Tribunal, addressing concerns regarding the management, actions, or conduct of companies, directors, auditors, or other stakeholders. These provisions underscore the significance of accountability and transparency in corporate governance, bolstering investor confidence and regulatory adherence.

Additionally, the Act inculcates supplementary protective measures and avenues for recourse:

  • Tribunal Application: Depositors can petition the Tribunal to address grievances arising from perceived malfeasance, seeking remedies against non-compliant company behaviour.
  • Audit Firm Liability: Liability extends to audit firms and their partners in cases of providing misleading information or engaging in fraudulent activities.
  • Class Action Provisions: Section 245 as mentioned above of the Act, facilitates collective legal action, empowering depositors to pursue collective remedies for damages incurred.

FAQ: Regulatory Restrictions on Public Deposits and Exemptions for Certain Companies under Section 73 of the Companies Act, 2013

  • Can a private company collect deposits from the public?

According to the Act, only certain entities such as banking companies, non-banking financial companies, housing finance companies, and those specified by the Central Government are permitted to solicit, accept, or renew deposits from the public. Therefore, private limited companies are expressly prohibited from accepting public deposits.

  • Can a company accept deposits from directors and their relatives?

Yes, companies have the authority to accept deposits from their directors and their relatives, provided specific conditions are met and requisite disclosures are made in accordance with regulatory guidelines.

  • What measures should a depositor adopt to ensure the safety of their deposits?

To safeguard deposited funds, depositors should ensure that the company complies with the requirements outlined in Section 73 of the Act and verify its authorization status. It is advisable for depositors to conduct a thorough assessment of the company’s financial health and creditworthiness before depositing funds to mitigate risks.


By understanding the prohibitions and exceptions outlined in the Act, companies can safeguard the interests of depositors while maintaining transparency and accountability in their financial transactions. Compliance requirements, such as obtaining prior consent through special resolutions and fulfilling disclosure obligations, underscore the importance of regulatory diligence in deposit-taking activities.

Non-compliance with regulatory provisions carries severe consequences, including fines and reputational damage. It is essential for companies and their officers to adhere to regulatory requirements meticulously to avoid legal repercussions and maintain trust in the corporate sector.

At InstaFiling, we recognize the complexity of navigating regulatory frameworks and the importance of seamless compliance. With our team of skilled professionals adept at guiding businesses through various corporate transitions, we ensure that your corporate endeavours are met with precision and proficiency. Trust InstaFiling to navigate the regulatory maze and propel your business towards success.

Request A Callback

    You may Also Call Us At

    +91 76790 91881
    Scroll to Top